NTA Monitor

Latest News

New version of network scanning tool arp-scan released

15th March 2011 A new version of a respected and popular network scanning tool has been released. Read More

Tests show rise in number of vulnerabilities affecting web applications with SQL Injection and XSS most common flaws

1st March 2011 SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) were the most common flaws found in web applications in 2010 according to results from tests carried out by NTA Monitor. Read More

Assess risk to manage effects of budget cuts

9th February 2011 Signs of economic recovery may be appearing in some industries, but for most organisations - particularly in the public sector - budget cuts and cost savings are here to stay for the foreseeable future. Read More

"Basic security threats not changed in 15 years"

1st February 2011 There may have been significant technological advances to the hardware and software organisations use, but according to Roy Hills, who co-founded NTA Monitor in 1996, the basic security threats have not changed in the last 15 years. Read More

Update management, is it secure?

Every security consultant worth his salt has recommended to clients that security patch management should be performed regularly and automated wherever possible. Anti-virus programs, web content protection software and spam filters should also be regularly updated; automatically where possible.

Updating of services such as anti-virus signatures, security patches, and website blacklists to mention just a few, are commendable initiatives that are helping to improve the security posture of organisations, as well as freeing up security resources and system administrators from undertaking laborious manual update procedures.

With the gap between the release of zero-day flaws and the follow-up virus or worm constantly shrinking down to a few hours in some cases, there is a real need for these solutions to work effectively. Web content filtering and spam filters fall into a similar category, with new phishing attack variants and undesirable websites springing up hourly, system administrators and ISPs must protect their clients as effectively as possible.

This raises some interesting points - how do the vendors ensure that these updates are delivered to servers and workstations in a secure way? And how easily could this process be circumvented to gain unauthorised access?

A lot of updates are digitally signed, but in some cases flawed mechanisms such Active-X controls (which have a history of security weaknesses) are used for propagation. Using attack vectors such as DNS cache poisoning, XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) and session hijacking, it seems feasible to use these services to gain access to the servers themselves, or depending on the attackers' motives, to create botnets.

So what should organisations be doing to manage this threat? Firstly, ensure that the update services are used in as secure manner as possible, so that only encrypted sessions (SSL) should be enabled for updates wherever possible. Firewalls should limit the access that servers on the internal networks or DMZs have to the Internet for updates, so strict IP addresses or domain names should be specified for the Internet-based update servers.

The software vendors must ensure that automatic updates have strong protection against malicious misuse and offer the ability to check the integrity of files downloaded, to ensure that updates do not become the next delivery method for malware or other unwanted content.