NTA Monitor

Latest News

New version of network scanning tool arp-scan released

15th March 2011 A new version of a respected and popular network scanning tool has been released. Read More

Tests show rise in number of vulnerabilities affecting web applications with SQL Injection and XSS most common flaws

1st March 2011 SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) were the most common flaws found in web applications in 2010 according to results from tests carried out by NTA Monitor. Read More

Assess risk to manage effects of budget cuts

9th February 2011 Signs of economic recovery may be appearing in some industries, but for most organisations - particularly in the public sector - budget cuts and cost savings are here to stay for the foreseeable future. Read More

"Basic security threats not changed in 15 years"

1st February 2011 There may have been significant technological advances to the hardware and software organisations use, but according to Roy Hills, who co-founded NTA Monitor in 1996, the basic security threats have not changed in the last 15 years. Read More
Date: 30th November 2005
Risk: High

The widely-deployed, open-source network intrusion detection system (IDS), Snort and its components used in other IDS products, notably Sourcefire Intrusion Sensors, and a number of operating system distributions, has been found vulnerable to a buffer overflow flaw.

Snort pre-processors are modular plug-ins that extend functionality by operating on packets before the detection engine is run. The Back Orifice pre-processor decodes packets to determine if they contain Back Orifice ping messages. The ping detection code does not adequately limit the amount of data that is read from the packet into a fixed-length buffer, thus creating the potential for a buffer overflow.

The vulnerable code will process any UDP packet that is not destined to or sourced from the default Back Orifice port (31337/udp). An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted UDP packet to a host or network monitored by Snort.

A remote attacker who can send UDP packets to a Snort sensor may be able to execute arbitrary code. Snort typically runs with root or SYSTEM privileges, so an attacker could take complete control of a vulnerable system. An attacker does not need to target a Snort sensor directly; the attacker can target any host or network monitored by Snort.

Mitigation procedure and workaround are available from the websites referenced below.

References